| 
Records Management involves deciding which of the many documents
the government produces will be of future value and interest and
should therefore be archived by The National Archives for posterity.
We spoke to Howard, who works in the Records Management department,
to find out more about this highly important function of the National
Archives.
Can you tell us a bit about your job and what it involves?
My job title is 'Inspecting Officer and Client Manager'. As an
'Inspecting Officer' I supervise and guide the records work done
by several government departments, including GCHQ ,
the British Council, FCO ,
the Security Service, and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI5
and MI6). I make sure that they keep documents worthy of permanent
preservation and throw away any documents that aren't once they
are no longer of use.
The 'Client Manager' part of the job is the more outward looking
aspect of the job, it involves engaging with other departments
to advise them on their current electronic and paper records management.
What particular challenges does electronic record keeping
pose?
When it comes to electronic records making sure significant records
are preserved is the key. This is a difficult task, because one
comes across a lot of data that looks very similar, and which
may not look very remarkable, e.g. records of driving licenses,
but as a whole, a collection of any such data can be of statistical
interest.
Another challenge is the archiving of emails because they can
involve a long complex chain of communication – a straightforward
email asking a basic question can end up 20 emails later as the
basis of a policy decision.
Technology can present us with a number of issues when preserving
electronic records. An electronic file created on one type of
hardware or software, may need to be converted into another format
for long-term storage, which makes archiving it very hard.
What criteria do you apply when deciding if a document
should be added to The National Archives?
All records created before 1660 must be kept. Nowadays for modern
records acquisition and disposition policies are laid out by
The National Archives guidelines. We in this department produce
operational selection policies used by departments to guide
their selection work. Before these are implemented the public
are invited to have a look and say if the policy meets their
needs and expectations or not, so it's a very open procedure.
The last selection policy I worked on was for records of overseas
registration of births, deaths and marriages; this produced an
enormous public response after it went out to public consultation,
and the input from the public is now influencing the policy as
it develops.
What's the most interesting or rare document you have
handled belonging to The National Archives?
My personal interest is in bridges so my favourite document comes
from the records of the Fulham Bridge Commissioners and Trustees.
This body was set up under a very bizarre act of Parliament, listing
the names of about 45 people and stating that they should meet
in the Swan public house in Putney to finance and build a bridge
between Fulham and Putney! It is perhaps unsurprising that the
minutes degenerate as the meetings progressed!
The Corporation of London was strongly opposed to the construction
of Fulham Bridge because at the time (1729) there wasn't a bridge
over the Thames anywhere between London Bridge and Kingston Bridge
and they feared that the new bridge would divert commerce away
from the City of London. But the Bridge went ahead despite the
obstacles placed by the Corporation of London and drunkenness,
though it has since been replaced.
What are you working on at the moment?
At the moment I am working on the personal files of SOE (Special
Operations Executive) agents from the Second World War. SOE agents
parachuted into occupied Europe on covert missions. I am working
through the files of about 1,200 agents so they can be released.
But because they are personal files they can't be released while
a former agent is still alive. The fate of many agents is unknown
because they were simply unheard of after landing in the occupied
territories; this complicates the task a good deal.
Finally, what do think will be achieved by the bringing
together of the Historical Manuscripts Commission and the Public
Record Office to form The National Archives?
It will mean a rounding out of the work my department does, currently
the department focuses on just central government records, but
our remit will cover a far wider and more general selection of
records once we have become The National Archives.
However, I think the new name of The National Archives will give
people a far better idea of what goes on here and I think the
name is far closer to the public's perception of what we do than
the current name. |